|
Archived News:
This article was originally published by
the Greater Madison Area Society for Human Resources
Management, Inc. in its September 2006 HR In Touch newsletter.
DO YOUR
I-9 FORMS PASS MUSTER?
By Susan
C. Sheeran
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS),
Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE), has made work site enforcement one of its
top priorities. The agency reports that it is
achieving great success in investigating and
prosecuting employers who have hired illegal
aliens. ICE has filed felony charges as well as
commenced enforcement actions under the
Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) against
those who harbor, transport and employ illegal
aliens. And it isn't just border states that are
under scrutiny. In August 2006, a Whitewater
business owner and 25 of his employees who were
alleged to be illegal immigrants were arrested.
Immigration reform is a hotly debated issue and
the subject of numerous legislative proposals.
While there are a variety of reforms under
consideration, they largely carry the same message
for employers: Be prepared for having additional
responsibility to ensure that your employees are
authorized to work in the United States. For
example, in June the ICE issued proposed
regulations that would place additional
responsibilities on employers who receive
"no-match" letters from the Social Security
Administration or as a result of an ICE audit of
an employer's I-9 forms. It is not known when the
proposed regulations may become final or what
revisions may occur before they are implemented.
For information on the proposed regulations, check
the June 14, 2006 Federal Register (71 FR 34281
(06/14/06)) or the DHS web site,
www.DHS.gov.
There are no plans to relieve employers of
their current obligations under the IRCA,
including obligations with respect to the
Employment Eligibility Verification - I-9 Form.
The IRCA, which has been in effect since 1986,
prohibits the employment of "unauthorized aliens,"
penalizes employers who hire them, and requires
all employers to verify that each employee hired
is authorized to work in the United States.
Employers are required to document the employer's
verification on the I-9 Form.
For most employers, completing and retaining
I-9 forms on all new hires has long become a
routine part of the hiring process. Some employers
have delegated responsibility for I-9 form
completion to lower level staff who may not have
been instructed and know little about I-9
compliance requirements. Since the completed I-9
forms are not routinely reviewed or audited by a
federal agency, it can be easy for the
verification and form completion process to become
careless, slipshod or even ignored.
Conducting regular self audits can help insure
that I-9 forms are filled out correctly and
completely. Under the IRCA, failure to complete
and retain the forms or employing unauthorized
aliens can result in fines ranging from $100 to
$10,000 and up to six months in prison. You can
obtain the I-9 form at
www.uscis.gov.
There is also a Handbook for Employers (Form
M-274) on the site, which provides more detailed
information about the I-9 form. The Handbook was
last updated in 1991 and in many respects is
outdated. The website also has a number of
Employer Information Bulletins which provide
updated information. Employer Bulletin 102, "The
Form I-9 Process in a Nutshell," provides a
particularly useful summary of current
requirements.
The I-9 form was reissued in May 2005 to
reflect that the Department of Homeland Security
is now the agency in charge of compliance;
however, it is the same basic form which has been
around since last updated in 1991. Like the
Handbook for Employers, it is outdated. It is
uncertain when the form will be revised to conform
to current requirements. Effective September 30,
1997, the list of acceptable documents to
establish identity and employment eligibility was
reduced, which means that some of the documents
listed on the back of the I-9 form are no longer
accepted or issued. Employer Information Bulletin
102 lists the documents that employers may
currently accept.
Some of the more important I-9 requirements and
tips on avoiding common errors include:
- An I-9 form is required for every
employee hired on or after November 6, 1986.
If you find forms are missing or were never
completed for one or more employees or if in
reviewing forms you find inadvertent errors were
made, complete a new form. New forms should not
be backdated, and if a new form is needed to
correct a mistake, keep the original and the new
form.
- The form must be signed by the employee,
the employer or authorized representative and a
preparer and/or translator if one is used. Note
that the employer "attests under penalty of
perjury...."
Do not sign an I-9 form if you did not
examine the documents identified on the form.
Employers sometimes have difficulty completing
the I-9 form for field or traveling employees
within three days of hire. It is not acceptable
for an employer to sign a form if the employee
completed a portion of the form and sends it to
the office without an authorized employer
representative examining documents presented by
the employee.
- Examine the documents presented by the
employee to make sure that the document appears
genuine and relates to the employee who you
hired.
Employers are not required to be document
experts, but will be held to a reasonableness
standard. Employers are not required to make a
photocopy of the documents presented. Some say
that it is not a good idea to do so, because the
employer may be creating evidence that they
accepted fraudulent documents. That risk does
not seem to be substantial, because in most
cases the quality of forged documents is quite
remarkable and not readily apparent to a
diligent employer. The advantage to making and
retaining a photocopy is that the employer has
evidence that it did actually review the listed
documents and that they appear to be genuine.
- Employers are required to retain I-9
forms for three years after the employee's date
of hire or one year after the employee's
termination, whichever is later.
These forms must be produced for authorized
officials of the Bureau of Immigration and
Customs Enforcement, Department of Labor or the
Justice Department, upon three days' notice.
Employers are not prohibited from filing the I-9
form in an employee's personnel file, but there
are several disadvantages to doing so. If an
employer is required to produce its I-9 forms
for a federal review or audit, the employer
would have to go through each current employee's
personnel file and the personnel files of
employees who were terminated within the
retention period to pull the forms. It is not a
good idea to allow a federal compliance officer
access to personnel files if there is no
requirement for an employer to do so. In
addition, the I-9 form and copies of documents
attached divulge the employee's citizenship or
immigration status and perhaps other information
on the employee's protected status. Supervisors
or managers reviewing the personnel file,
perhaps to consider the employee for a
promotion, would have access to irrelevant
information and information that might give rise
to discrimination claims.
- Employers are required to reverify an
employee's employment eligibility if and when
the employment authorization listed on the form
expires.
Establishing a "tickler" system to provide a
reminder of expiring employee work
authorizations well in advance of the expiration
date can prove helpful for the employee and the
employer. Since the time period necessary for
the employee to renew their authorization can be
lengthy and delays are not uncommon, starting
early can be important for the employee's
continued employment. Receipts showing the
employee applied for an extension or renewal of
his/her work authorization are not acceptable,
and the I-9 verification must be completed no
later than the date the employment authorization
expires.
Go to
In the News
This page is intended to provide
general information about various legal issues and
developments. It is not intended to be a
complete list of all recent legal
developments. This page does not constitute
legal advice and should not be relied upon in
dealing with specific factual or legal
matters. |